draft codex mrls  (Akoya Biosciences)

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques:

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Translocation Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of the consumer risk assessment

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques:

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of the residue definitions derived by JMPR and at EU level

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of the residue definitions derived by JMPR and at EU level

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Marker

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Molecular Weight

Journal: EFSA Journal

Article Title: Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 52nd Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues ( CCPR )

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6766

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Codex MRL proposals derived by JMPR with EU MRLs

Article Snippet: The requested advice and comments on the recommendations of the 20 active substances of the extraordinary Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticides residues (JMPR) of 7–17 May 2019 and the 27 active substances of the JMPR Regular meeting of 17–26 September 2019 and, where appropriate, on other proposed Codex MRLs, retained in the step procedure and reviewed by JMPR in previous years, should contain the following information: Background information on all active substances under discussion regarding the status of the active substance at EU level (approval status of the active substance, availability of EFSA conclusions and availability of EFSA reasoned opinions on MRL applications or MRL review); In case new toxicological reference values were proposed by JMPR, a comparison of the proposed reference values with agreed EU reference values and an evaluation of the possible reasons for differences; As regard the proposed draft Codex MRLs for discussion in CCPR 2020, EFSA should provide relevant comments on the proposed MRLs and specifically address the following questions: ○ Whether the residue definitions derived by JMPR are comparable with the existing EU residue definitions, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are comparable with the existing EU MRLs, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are sufficiently supported by data, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are appropriate in terms of the data that have been used to establish them and in terms of the method used for their calculation, ○ Whether the proposed draft Codex MRLs are safe for European consumers with regard to chronic, and where relevant, acute exposure.

Techniques: Derivative Assay